<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ActionScript3 speed test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.victordramba.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=16" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.victordramba.com/?p=16</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.victordramba.com/?p=16&#038;cpage=1#comment-5655</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victordramba.com/?p=16#comment-5655</guid>
		<description>I am measuring us not ms. Check the *1000 multiplication.

And I redone this kinds of tests with Tamarin alone in various environments. The results were similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am measuring us not ms. Check the *1000 multiplication.</p>
<p>And I redone this kinds of tests with Tamarin alone in various environments. The results were similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madox</title>
		<link>http://www.victordramba.com/?p=16&#038;cpage=1#comment-5649</link>
		<dc:creator>Madox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victordramba.com/?p=16#comment-5649</guid>
		<description>You are measuring MILLIseconds, not MICROseconds. If PHP really was 600 microseconds, then that is faster than AS3&#039;s 50 or 150 millisecond time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are measuring MILLIseconds, not MICROseconds. If PHP really was 600 microseconds, then that is faster than AS3&#8217;s 50 or 150 millisecond time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.victordramba.com/?p=16&#038;cpage=1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victordramba.com/?p=16#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Thanks for dropping by.
There are certain cases when you&#039;ll really prefer processing data on the client-side. Although this speed evaluation might not be very accurate, we have a clue that AS3 is at least comparable with most server-side scripting langs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for dropping by.<br />
There are certain cases when you&#8217;ll really prefer processing data on the client-side. Although this speed evaluation might not be very accurate, we have a clue that AS3 is at least comparable with most server-side scripting langs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.victordramba.com/?p=16&#038;cpage=1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victordramba.com/?p=16#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Very cool!  When deciding whether I should process some data at the server (PHP)  or the client (AS3) I&#039;ve considered datasize, and server processing usage, and just today found myself wondering which language processed faster.  Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool!  When deciding whether I should process some data at the server (PHP)  or the client (AS3) I&#8217;ve considered datasize, and server processing usage, and just today found myself wondering which language processed faster.  Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
